Monday, September 14, 2026
To Tell the Truth
Three contestants claim to be the same person. Four celebrities question the contestants, then vote for the one they think is the real person. This simple game has endured as a TV classic for over 45 years. Today's assignment pays tribute to the show that asked the burning question...
"Will the real ________ please stand up?"
With your group you are each to choose a fact for the historical figure assigned you. Use your Biography Handout as a resource. All of your facts should be made false except one. After presenting your facts in front of the class they will try to guess which is true. The more realistic/ believable your facts the better chance you have of fooling your classmates and winning the game.
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Common Sense
"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph."
On January 9th, 1776, the pamphlet "Common Sense" was published in Philadelphia. The pamphlet immediately becomes a bestseller, selling tens of thousands of copies across America. In "Common Sense," Thomas Paine, the author and violent foe of aristocracy and monarchy, attacks the King and Parliament and offers Americans an alternative to British rule: true independence.
Thomas Paine died in New York in 1809. Because of his controversial writings against orthodox religion in The Age of Reason, the local Quaker cemetery refused to let him be buried there. He was buried instead on his farm. In 1819, an English journalist named William Cobbett dug up Paine's bones. Cobbett wanted to give Paine a hero's reburial in England. The plan failed, the British public did not care, and the bones remained in Cobbett’s possession when he died. After that, the bones were scattered and lost.
Tuesday, September 8, 2026
You Say You Want a REVOLUTION?
This song was released in 1968. What was it about?
We are about to study revolutions that happened roughly 1750–1900.
Why might people separated by almost 200 years use the same word—"revolution"—to describe political change?
Read the introduction to Chapter 15 and then answer these questions:
WHAT IS A REVOLUTION?
What does "revolution" mean?
Why do people want revolutions?
What are people usually trying to change?
Can a revolution be peaceful?
Is revolution always a good thing?
Who decides whether a revolution is justified?
Friday, September 4, 2026
Rock Me Amadeus!
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart came to fame during the Age of Enlightenment. His compositions were informed by the spirit of that era, and Enlightenment ideas were integral to his music, particularly the operas. In fact, whether we would even have some of his most beloved operas without the guiding principles of the Age is doubtful.
Mozart’s genius did not spring forth in isolation. In fact, he was very much engaged in the world around him, and his “moment,” so to speak, coincided with the full flowering of the Age of Enlightenment. New thinkers – among them Voltaire, Rousseau, and Diderot – sought to flush away medieval attitudes about religion and the “divine right” of kings and replace them with a revolutionary faith in reason, order, and science.
Thursday, September 3, 2026
Feudalism vs. Free Market
Under this system, people were bound to one another by promises of loyalty. In theory, all the land in the kingdom belonged to the monarch (usually a king, but sometimes a queen). A large amount of land was also owned by the Church. The king kept some land for himself and gave fiefs (FEEFS), or land grants, to his most important lords, who became his vassals. In return, each lord had to supply the king with knights in times of war. A lord then enlisted lesser lords and knights as his vassals. At times, these arrangements were written down, and some of these contracts even survive to this day in museums.
At the bottom of the social system were peasants. Lords rented some of their land to the peasants who worked for them. However, some peasants, called serfs, were “tied” to the land they worked, which meant that they could not leave the lord’s land without permission and had to farm his fields in exchange for a small plot of their own.
Why did Feudalism work? What choice did the peasants have? Was it fair?
A key figure in the British Enlightenment was the Scottish philosopher Adam Smith. His book The Wealth of Nations laid the foundations for modern economics. Smith believed that a free market was driven by competition and individuals' self-interest. These drivers serve as an "invisible hand" that guides market activity to the benefit of society as a whole.
However, Smith also argued that a successful economic system must help the poor. As he wrote: "No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable."It is his own advantage, indeed, and not that of the society, which he has in view … He intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.
—Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776
Answer these questions after our in class Feudalsim Activity:
2) Who struggled? Why?
3) Did wealth depend on:Your original social class?Your economic decisions?Luck?
4) If you played the game over again what would you do differently? Why?
5) Compare and conntrast Feudalism to Capitalism. Which is a better system? Why?
Monday, August 31, 2026
Gilligan's Island & the Enlightenment
You are stranded on Gilligan's Island. Who gets to make the rules?”
You aren't just trying to survive. You're trying to create a society.
There is no government.
There is no police force.
There is no court.
There is no constitution.
There is no telephone.
There is no way to contact the outside world.
What happens next?
Who would have the most power?
Someone has to decide how the food will be distributed.
Who decides?
What rules should exist?
Who enforces the rules?
What happens if someone breaks them?
Does everyone get an equal amount?
Does the person doing the most work get more?
Does the person who found the food get more?
Can someone refuse to follow the rules?
Here's the fascinating part: people in Europe during the 1600s and 1700s were wrestling with many of these same questions.
Hobbes might argue:
Without strong authority, the island will descend into chaos.
Locke might argue:
Montesquieu:
Rousseau:
Voltaire:
Wollstonecraft:
You can't claim to believe in universal rights while excluding half the population.
Monday, August 24, 2026
Chariots of the Gods
What if some of the greatest mysteries of human history have been misunderstood?
Imagine standing before the Great Pyramid of Egypt, looking up at millions of enormous stones fitted together with remarkable precision. Or imagine seeing the giant statues of Easter Island, the mysterious lines of Nazca, or ancient drawings that seem to show strange machines and flying objects. Who built these things? How did they do it? And where did their ideas come from?
In Chariots of the Gods, Erich von Däniken takes these questions and pushes them in a dramatic direction. His central idea is controversial: perhaps visitors from other worlds came to Earth thousands of years ago, and ancient people misunderstood these visitors as gods.
Von Däniken travels across history looking for clues. He examines ancient monuments, maps, myths, religious stories, and unusual artifacts. He points to places such as the Egyptian pyramids, the Nazca Lines in Peru, Tiahuanaco in Bolivia, Easter Island, and ancient Maya cities. He argues that some of these achievements seem difficult to explain using the technology we normally associate with ancient civilizations.
He also looks at ancient stories. What if descriptions of gods flying through the sky were not stories about supernatural beings—but memories of real visitors arriving in advanced machines? What if ancient pictures that appear to show strange vehicles or figures in unusual clothing were attempts to record encounters with technology people did not understand?
It is important to remember that Von Däniken's ideas are controversial. He often presents questions and unusual possibilities as evidence for his theories. Many historians and archaeologists disagree with his conclusions and argue that ancient Egyptians were capable of extraordinary engineering without help from extraterrestrials.
As you read, don't simply ask, “Do I believe Von Däniken?”
Ask the historian's questions:
What is the evidence? What other explanations are possible? Is the evidence being interpreted fairly? What information is missing? And what evidence would convince me that the claim is true—or false?
The mystery is not only what happened in the ancient past.
The mystery is also how we know what we think we know about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



